nanog mailing list archives

wiretapping continues....


From: "Martin L. Schoffstall" <schoff () us psi com>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 1994 08:48:04 -0500


John Scudder then discussed some modeling he and Sue Hares have done 
on the projected load at the NAPs. The basic conclusions are that the 
FDDI technology (at Sprint) will be saturated sometime next year and 
that load-balancing strategies among NSPs across the NAPS is 
imperative for the long term viability of the new architecture. John 
also expressed concern over the lack of expressed policy for 
the collection of statistical data by the NAP operators. All of the 
NAP operator are present and stated that they will collect data, but 
that there are serious and open questions concerning the privacy of 
that data and how to publish it appropriately. John said that 
collecting the data was most important. Without the data, there is 
no source information from which publication become possible. He said 
that MERIT/NSFNET had already tackled these issues. Maybe the 
NAP operators can use this previous work as a model to develop their 
own policies for publication. 
 

Merit/NSFNet already tackled these issues in an insufficent and unopen manner.

MarkFedor/ColeLibby from PSI said there was a "quiet" admission that the old 
methodology was already "approved" for the SPRINT NAP.

Marty

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Current thread: