nanog mailing list archives

Re: February Meeting

From: bmanning () ISI EDU
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 1994 09:28:44 -0800 (PST)


Bill,
  I agree that we would not be able to co-opt the ISoc meeting to be
specifically North America focused.
  I also agree, of course, that NANOG, EOF, and the IEPG are distinct groups
with distinct charters.  I do not advocate any merger.
  But I *do* believe that it would be in the best interests of NANOG (and
IEPG) for us to take advantage of this opportunity.
      -- Guy


True.  So, Scott... 

        What can we do to help out?

-- 
--bill
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Current thread:

Re: February Meeting, (continued)
- - Re: February Meeting Matt Mathis (Dec 09)
    - Re: February Meeting Jamshid Mahdavi (Dec 10)
- Re: February Meeting Erik Sherk (Dec 09)
- Re: February Meeting Tim Salo (Dec 14)
- Re: February Meeting Tim Salo (Dec 14)
  - Re: February Meeting John W. Stewart III (Dec 15)
- Re: February Meeting Guy Almes (Dec 15)
  - Re: February Meeting bmanning (Dec 15)
  - Re: February Meeting bmanning (Dec 15)
- Re: February Meeting Guy Almes (Dec 15)
  - Re: February Meeting bmanning (Dec 15)
- Re: February Meeting Elise Gerich (Dec 23)
- Re: February Meeting Scott Bradner (Dec 23)
  - Re: February Meeting Elise Gerich (Dec 23)