nanog mailing list archives
Re: February Meeting
From: Guy Almes <almes () ans net>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 94 12:26:26 EST
Bill, I agree that we would not be able to co-opt the ISoc meeting to be specifically North America focused. I also agree, of course, that NANOG, EOF, and the IEPG are distinct groups with distinct charters. I do not advocate any merger. But I *do* believe that it would be in the best interests of NANOG (and IEPG) for us to take advantage of this opportunity. -- Guy - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: February Meeting, (continued)
- Re: February Meeting Vince Fuller (Dec 09)
- Re: February Meeting Matt Mathis (Dec 09)
- Re: February Meeting Jamshid Mahdavi (Dec 10)
- Re: February Meeting Matt Mathis (Dec 09)
- Re: February Meeting Erik Sherk (Dec 09)
- Re: February Meeting Tim Salo (Dec 14)
- Re: February Meeting Tim Salo (Dec 14)
- Re: February Meeting John W. Stewart III (Dec 15)
- Re: February Meeting Guy Almes (Dec 15)
- Re: February Meeting bmanning (Dec 15)
- Re: February Meeting bmanning (Dec 15)
- Re: February Meeting Guy Almes (Dec 15)
- Re: February Meeting bmanning (Dec 15)
- Re: February Meeting Elise Gerich (Dec 23)
- Re: February Meeting Scott Bradner (Dec 23)
- Re: February Meeting Elise Gerich (Dec 23)
- Re: February Meeting Vince Fuller (Dec 09)