nanog mailing list archives
Re: 20402 routing entries
From: Jessica Yu <jyy () merit edu>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 1994 14:58:34 -0400
According to NSF/ANSNET data, 23 aggregates ALONG with its covered 898 specific routes are co-exist in the routing table now. If the ASs withdraws all these more specific routes, the routing table could be reduced by 898. Given the urgent need of reduce the routing table size, would these ASs withdraw those specific routes as soon as possible?
I tried. They told me that the forms and policy for removing more specific routes were not in place yet, and that there would be an announcement about it in a week or so. (I tried to remove 150 routes). I've got a few hundred more to do next week.
Bob, You just need to stop advertising those more specific routes if you have already advertised the aggregate that covers them. It will do the job of reducing the routing table. --jessica - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: 20402 routing entries, (continued)
- Re: 20402 routing entries Martin Lee Schoffstall (Apr 18)
- Re: 20402 routing entries Dennis Ferguson (Apr 15)
- Re: 20402 routing entries Martin Lee Schoffstall (Apr 15)
- 20402 routing entries Tony Li (Apr 15)
- Re: 20402 routing entries Daniel Karrenberg (Apr 16)
- Re: 20402 routing entries Bob Hinden (Apr 17)
- Re: 20402 routing entries Martin Lee Schoffstall (Apr 15)
- Re: 20402 routing entries Jessica Yu (Apr 15)
- Re: 20402 routing entries Martin Lee Schoffstall (Apr 15)
- Re: 20402 routing entries Pushpendra Mohta (Apr 15)
- Re: 20402 routing entries Steven J. Richardson (Apr 15)
- Re: 20402 routing entries Susan Hares (Apr 21)
- Re: 20402 routing entries Peter S. Ford (Apr 15)
- Re: 20402 routing entries William Manning (Apr 15)