nanog mailing list archives
Re: this week's CIDR progress report
From: Jessica Yu <jyy () merit edu>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 1994 18:18:36 -0400
Got a list of routes which are not in the NSFnet table but some other places. Spot that one incident that the aggregate is advertised to both routing tables, but there are few specific routes within the aggregate has been advertised to the NSFNET. So in terms of connectivity, both can reach all the specific routes destination, but the path would be different. However, that cause the difference in size of the routing table. This is just the one I happen to see but there could be more such cases. This indicates reason #1 in my previous message. I also saw a lot of routes in the diff list looks like testnets but not quite sure. I do not have time to do more poking today, I will do it on Monday. --Jessica - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- this week's CIDR progress report Jessica Yu (Apr 22)
- Re: this week's CIDR progress report Andrew Partan (Apr 22)
- Re: this week's CIDR progress report Tony Bates (Apr 22)
- Re: this week's CIDR progress report Jessica Yu (Apr 22)
- Re: this week's CIDR progress report Jessica Yu (Apr 22)
- classless nets and home ASs epg (Apr 25)
- Re: classless nets and home ASs Erik Sherk (Apr 25)
- Re: classless nets and home ASs Andrew Partan (Apr 25)
- Re: classless nets and home ASs epg (Apr 25)
- Re: this week's CIDR progress report Jessica Yu (Apr 25)
- Re: this week's CIDR progress report Andrew Partan (Apr 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: this week's CIDR progress report Steven K. Widmayer (Apr 24)