Re: News from Metasploit 4.

[Richard Miles <richard.k.miles () googlemail com>]

Hi Egypt,

It's awesome, thanks for information. Also, do you have a working
version for 64 bits?

Any follow-up on the other 2 questions on the e-mail?

Thanks

On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 9:20 AM,  <egypt () metasploit com> wrote:
> Yes, reverse_http(s) both use the WinInet API, and as such, use IE's
> proxy configuration, including credentials.
>
> egypt
>
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 2:28 AM, Richard Miles
> <richard.k.miles () googlemail com> wrote:
> > Hey Patrick,
> >
> > Awesome, with the new reverse_http or reverse_https? Metasploit 4?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 7:37 PM, Patrick Webster <patrick () aushack com> wrote:
> > > Hey Richard,
> > >
> > > I cannot guarantee 100%, but re: point #1, I have successfully used
> > > the stager to get around proxies with auth about 2 months ago.
> > >
> > > -Patrick
> > >
> > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Richard Miles
> > > <richard.k.miles () googlemail com> wrote:
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > I friend of mine was talking about some great improvements at
> > > > Metasploit 4, I checked the blog and it talks very briefly about it,
> > > > what more called my attention is that reverse_http and reverse_https
> > > > was updated and meterpreter scripts / resources too.
> > > >
> > > > I have 3 questions...
> > > >
> > > > 1 - The new reverse_http and reverse_https now are as good as passiveX
> > > > was? I mean, we can use it completely over http or https (even the
> > > > stager) and the payload is smart enough to get proxy IP and port from
> > > > browser and re-use the same credential (in case that proxy require
> > > > auth)?
> > _______________________________________________
> > https://mail.metasploit.com/mailman/listinfo/framework
_______________________________________________
https://mail.metasploit.com/mailman/listinfo/framework