Metasploit mailing list archives
Re: Autopwn vs. manual
From: Nelson <komseh () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 21:05:12 -0600
Are you sure that db_nmap is detecting the port as open? check by running db_services once db_nmap is complete. On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 8:55 PM, James Lay <jlay () slave-tothe-box net> wrote:
From: HD Moore <hdm () metasploit com> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 21:45:05 -0500 To: <framework () spool metasploit com> Subject: Re: [framework] Autopwn vs. manual On 3/24/2010 6:42 PM, James Lay wrote:Hey all. So...with autopwn p t e r I can¹t exploit ms08_067. But when I manually do it with setting the payload and RHOST and the like it works. Is there something I¹m missing or not doing? Thanks for any help.Does port 445 show as open? Is it launching this exploit against the target? Are you setting the TARGET variable manually? -HDHere's what I'm doing: Db_create /tmp/bleh.db Db_nmap -v -sV 10.20.187.71 Db_autopwn -p -t -e -r That's pretty much it...it finds everything and away it goes, but when it's done I get zero sessions. Am I doing something wrong? Also yes..445 is open because if I manually choose ms08_067, set all the options, then exploit it works like a champ. Thanks. James _______________________________________________ https://mail.metasploit.com/mailman/listinfo/framework
_______________________________________________ https://mail.metasploit.com/mailman/listinfo/framework
Current thread:
- Autopwn vs. manual James Lay (Mar 24)
- Re: Autopwn vs. manual HD Moore (Mar 24)
- Re: Autopwn vs. manual James Lay (Mar 24)
- Re: Autopwn vs. manual Nelson (Mar 24)
- Re: Autopwn vs. manual James Lay (Mar 24)
- Re: Autopwn vs. manual HD Moore (Mar 24)