Metasploit mailing list archives

Re: possible bug in MSFCLI and msfencode?

From: HD Moore <hdm () metasploit com>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 06:24:14 -0600

On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 08:51 +0100, Thomas Werth wrote:

but second one is still open ...
Using an other encoder works so should there be a warning instead of
an abort about this in msfencode?


The encoder is being specified on the command line, the easy fix is just
remove the -e passed to msfencode. It can be used, but it requires a
specific configuration to work.

-HD


_______________________________________________
https://mail.metasploit.com/mailman/listinfo/framework

Current thread:

Re: ruby coding question, (continued)
- - - Re: ruby coding question HD Moore (Dec 08)
    - patchup prefix Jeffs (Dec 10)
    - Re: patchup prefix egypt (Dec 10)
    - Re: patchup prefix HD Moore (Dec 10)
    - exploit -j command Jeffs (Dec 10)
    - Re: exploit -j command egypt (Dec 10)
    - possible bug in MSFCLI and msfencode? Thomas Werth (Dec 10)
    - Re: possible bug in MSFCLI and msfencode? HD Moore (Dec 10)
    - Re: possible bug in MSFCLI and msfencode? Thomas Werth (Dec 10)
    - Re: possible bug in MSFCLI and msfencode? Thomas Werth (Dec 10)
    - Re: possible bug in MSFCLI and msfencode? HD Moore (Dec 11)
    - Re: exploit -j command HD Moore (Dec 10)
    - encoded payload question Jeffs (Dec 13)
    - Re: encoded payload question MC (Dec 14)
    - Re: encoded payload question Jeffs (Dec 14)
    - Re: encoded payload question HD Moore (Dec 14)