Interesting People mailing list archives
Re Radical New In-Memory Computing Architecture Will Deliver 200X Speed Gain
From: "Dave Farber" <farber () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2017 13:35:59 -0400
Begin forwarded message:
From: Gregory Aharonian <greg.aharonian () gmail com> Date: October 28, 2017 at 1:22:36 PM EDT To: Dave Farber <dave () farber net> Subject: Re: [IP] Radical New In-Memory Computing Architecture Will Deliver 200X Speed Gain Dave, In a paper published in 2012 (available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Kentaro_Sano2/publication/262309506_Domain-Specific_Language_and_Compiler_for_Stencil_Computation_on_FPGA-Based_Systolic_Computational-Memory_Array/links/544371d50cf2a76a3ccb185d/Domain-Specific-Language-and-Compiler-for-Stencil-Computation-on-FPGA-Based-Systolic-Computational-Memory-Array.pdf) There appears two diagrams at the top of page 4. Compare these with similar pictures in the fluff-piece written by KurzweillAI - much the same technology of putting a processor inside of a memory block. Thousands of such papers. A lot of IBM's innovation prowess isn't. If they file a patent application, and don't cite this paper, that it troubling, though typical. Dr.Watson - we just reported our 22nd straight quarter of losses. What should we do? What do I know - eat some of Algernon's flowers? Greg Aharonian Internet Patent News ServiceOn Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Dave Farber <farber () gmail com> wrote: Nice idea! The only problem is that IBM did not invented! I have been several of the companies that Have done similar things. I want to why IBM has a tendency to claim originality. Four instance for a long time They claimed that the token ring that they developed was original. They finally conceded that in fact it was a copy of the Irvine token ring Dave Btw computing in memory was and is a good idea!! Begin forwarded message:From: "Ridgely C. Evers" <rce () evers org> Date: October 28, 2017 at 11:02:26 AM EDT To: David Farber <dave () farber net> Subject: Radical New In-Memory Computing Architecture Will Deliver 200X Speed Gain Dave, For IP, if you wish. I’d certainly be interested in IPers’ thoughts... http://www.kurzweilai.net/ibm-scientists-say-radical-new-in-memory-computing-architecture-will-speed-up-computers-by-200-times Best, —RidgeArchives | Modify Your Subscription | Unsubscribe Now
------------------------------------------- Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/18849915-ae8fa580 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=18849915&id_secret=18849915-aa268125 Unsubscribe Now: https://www.listbox.com/unsubscribe/?member_id=18849915&id_secret=18849915-32545cb4&post_id=20171028133609:79CD1016-BC06-11E7-82CC-F9646762A726 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
Current thread:
- Re Radical New In-Memory Computing Architecture Will Deliver 200X Speed Gain Dave Farber (Oct 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re Radical New In-Memory Computing Architecture Will Deliver 200X Speed Gain Dave Farber (Oct 28)
- Re Radical New In-Memory Computing Architecture Will Deliver 200X Speed Gain Dave Farber (Oct 29)