Interesting People mailing list archives
Re: The balance of power in airport security screening
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 08:09:43 -0500
At least for now, one choice is to avoid flying through the UK airports on a connecting basis at least. If there were a significent drop in business the airlines would react. Dave On Feb 3, 2010, at 7:31 AM, Gordon Syme wrote: Prof. Farber, for IP if you wish: According to http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/8490860.stm passengers 'selected' to be scanned by the full-body scanners (the article does not specify if they are X-ray or not) have no choice, they must either submit to the scan or not fly. There is no alternative pat-down or similar. ------------------------------------------- Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/ Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
Current thread:
- The balance of power in airport security screening David Farber (Feb 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: The balance of power in airport security screening David Farber (Feb 03)
- The balance of power in airport security screening Dave Farber (Feb 03)
- Re: The balance of power in airport security screening David Farber (Feb 04)
- Re: The balance of power in airport security screening Dave Farber (Feb 04)