Interesting People mailing list archives
Re: Larry Page wants "Wi-Fi on Steroids"
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 10:36:25 -0700
________________________________________ From: ken [Ken () new-isp net] Sent: Saturday, May 24, 2008 12:07 PM To: David Farber Subject: Re: [IP] Larry Page wants "Wi-Fi on Steroids" Dave, As any HAM radio operator will confirm, when you use the lower end of the RF spectrum, a phenomenon known as "ducting" or "skipping" occurs when certain atmospheric conditions occur. http://www.tvtechnology.com/features/On-RF/f-DL-signals.shtml This is a phenomenon many of us older folks will recall from childhood, back in the day when all television programming was delivered off-air and television stations used to routinely shut down overnight. Growing up in the Boston area our three television stations used to stop broadcasting early in the evening on weekdays and once in a great while I could enjoy Philadelphia programming, in perfect clarity, since they broadcast later into the night. The "White Space" band we are about to put into use for broadband is exactly that same slice of spectrum and the same problem is going to occasionally occur, one that will cause incredible difficulty if we look at the potential for interference this will provide. While I support any additional spectrum that might be added to the available bands, this is not what I would consider to be an optimal choice. An alternative suggestion that I would prefer to see implemented, one that the FCC has shown a willingness to allow, is the spectrum sharing concept. This idea would mandate licensed bands accommodate a "low power underlay" that would regulate output power equal to today's 2.4GHz WiFi equipment. As you are probably aware, many of the licensed bands in the US lay fallow in most, if not all, of this country and even in locations where these bands are currently in use, they are granted a far greater output power than these proposed devices. Naturally, this would make it impossible for any low power device to cause interference with them. Respectfully, Ken DiPietro/CEO NextGenCommunications Home/Office (301)789-2968 www.NextGenCommunications.net Communications without Concessions PS - I would like to give credit to Dewayne Hendricks for pointing this issue out to me. While I was previously aware of the ducting phenomenon I had not thought about the possible issue as it applied to this use. On Sat, 2008-05-24 at 11:17 -0400, David Farber wrote:
Why insanity? On May 24, 2008, at 8:42 AM, ken <Ken () new-isp net> wrote:Perhaps Congress can initiate steroid abuse investigations into this insanity, as well. Respectfully, Ken DiPietro New-ISP/NextGenCommunications On Sat, 2008-05-24 at 08:00 -0400, David Farber wrote:<http://googlepublicpolicy.blogspot.com/2008/05/larry-page-talks-about-googles-vision.html------------------------------------------- Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/ Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
Ken DiPietro/CEO NextGenCommunications Home/Office (301)789-2968 www.NextGenCommunications.net Communications without Concessions ------------------------------------------- Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/ Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
Current thread:
- Larry Page wants "Wi-Fi on Steroids" David Farber (May 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Larry Page wants "Wi-Fi on Steroids" David Farber (May 24)
- Re: Larry Page wants "Wi-Fi on Steroids" David Farber (May 26)