Interesting People mailing list archives
Does US Constitution SPECIFICALLY PROHBITS the passing of retroactive laws
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 12:09:10 -0800
________________________________________ From: Gordon Peterson [gep2 () terabites com] Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2008 2:34 PM To: David Farber Subject: Re: [IP] Re: BEST LAW MONAY CAN BUY -- Senate votes Telecom immunity A recent post I read on the subject pointed out that the US Constitution SPECIFICALLY PROHBITS the passing of retroactive laws... which means that for the pResident to press for, or for Congress to pass, such legislation would be a dereliction of their duty and their sworn oath of office... and thus, in fact, itself (another!) impeachable offense. -- Gordon Peterson II http://personal.terabites.com 1977-2007: Thirty year anniversary of local area networking ------------------------------------------- Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/ Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
Current thread:
- Does US Constitution SPECIFICALLY PROHBITS the passing of retroactive laws David Farber (Feb 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Does US Constitution SPECIFICALLY PROHBITS the passing of retroactive laws David Farber (Feb 18)
- Re: Does US Constitution SPECIFICALLY PROHBITS the passing of retroactive laws David Farber (Feb 18)