Interesting People mailing list archives
more on quert on US unilateral control of ICANN backfires in WSIS.
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 11:28:55 -0400
Begin forwarded message: From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb () cs columbia edu> Date: October 2, 2005 6:43:06 PM EDT To: dave () farber net Cc: bray () globe comSubject: Re: [IP] more on quert on US unilateral control of ICANN backfires in WSIS.
In message <5F24C5D6-8E13-4120-A497-781A12EAE508 () farber net>, David Farber writ
es:
On Oct 2, 2005, at 6:05 PM, h_bray () globe com wrote:Somebody fill me in on this: If the US refuses to hand over control ofICANN, can anybody take it from us? If so, how?
When my son was about four years old, he asked me "why is a dollar bill worth a dollar?" My answer was simple, though unsatisfying to a child that young: "Because we agree that it is". It's much the same with ICANN. The essential players -- virtually all ISPs, major companies, etc. -- agree that ICANN is the root. There is absolutely nothing to stop anyone from listening to a different root authority; indeed, some people have tried. But the vast majority have not gone along, mostly because they understand the chaos that would ensue. ICANN controls a number of things that are, in some sense, policy-neutral, but still require general agreement if the net is to function. These include questions like "what TLDs should exist", "who runs .COM", and a few more. The interesting question now is what would happen if, say, the rest of the world decided not to listen to ICANN. Who would renew the contract for .COM when it expires? Who would decide what new TLDs should be created? What if ICANN and this hypothetical new agency were to disagree? (I realize that there are people who think the net would continue to work well enough. I'm very much not of that opinion; one major reason for not using, say, search engine technology is that the net is far more than just email and the Web; many other applications don't have the easy fallback to a human to disambiguate the answers.) --Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as lists-ip () insecure org To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- more on quert on US unilateral control of ICANN backfires in WSIS. David Farber (Oct 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- more on quert on US unilateral control of ICANN backfires in WSIS. David Farber (Oct 03)