Interesting People mailing list archives

The Demise of the Album?


From: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 10:49:42 -0400


Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 00:55:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: Joseph Lorenzo Hall <jhall () astron berkeley edu>
Subject: The Demise of the Album?
X-X-Sender: jhall@irk
To: Dave Farber <dave () farber net>, Declan McCullagh <declan () well com>



(via JD Lasica... http://www.jdlasica.com/blog/ )

Dave, Declan, An exceptional piece that explores an interesing
point... I must admit, I've taken to queueing up all of my digital
library at once and letting it play on random repeat. -Joe

---
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/07/20/weekinreview/20PARE.html

What Albums Join Together, Everyone Tears Asunder
By JON PARELES
July 20, 2003

The pop album made its way through the 20th century by staying
adaptable, transforming itself from analog grooves to digital bits.
But can the notion of an album  a collection of songs sold as a single
unit, to be heard in a certain sequence  survive the Internet?

That question has been raised more insistently since Apple Computers
started its iTunes store, where songs can be downloaded for 99 cents
and complete albums for $9.99. Apple recently announced that 6.5
million songs have been downloaded since the store opened on April 28,
fewer than half of them as part of albums. Its competition, Buy.com's
buymusic.com, is expected to announce its opening on Tuesday, selling
downloads for the much more widely used Windows operating system.

With less hoopla, music retailers like Amazon and Tower Records are
already selling individual songs to be downloaded, dismantling the
albums they came from. Subscription services like Pressplay, MusicNet
and Rhapsody also offer individual songs. And then there are the
millions of unauthorized copies of songs bouncing around the Internet
on networks like KaZaA, which continue to flourish despite the
Recording Industry Association of America's threats to sue users.

With so many unattached songs to choose from, listeners are becoming
disc jockeys, or perhaps file jockeys. In the 1980's heyday of the
cassette, many dedicated music fans made mix tapes, spending hours
choosing just the right succession of songs and taping them one by
one. But mix-tape methodology is now everywhere. With a few clicks,
multitudes of more casual listeners sift through the songs on their
hard drives, burning their own compilations onto homemade CD's or
creating playlists for their Ipods or the software players on their
computers.

Even within an album, the programming features of CD's have long
allowed listeners to skip or shuffle songs at whim. "Younger listeners
don't listen through an album," said Val Azzoli, the co-chairman of
the Atlantic Group. "Maybe they listen to track 1, track 3 and track
8."

While computer commerce and short attention spans are working against
the survival of the album, there is, of course, resistance. Metallica,
Radiohead, Led Zeppelin, the Beastie Boys and others have refused to
sell their music through iTunes because Apple insists on making all
songs available separately. They see their albums, not separate songs,
as the artistic unit.

"We like to see our work released in that collective form that we've
created it in and have always created our work in and grew up in,"
said Lars Ulrich, Metallica's drummer and songwriter. "It's about an
experience that's 40 or 50 or 60 minutes long. It was always about how
those songs fit together: the fast song next to the slow song next to
the crunchy one next to the ballad next to the instrumental. There was
a balance, and you had all these dynamics within the experience. I
like the relentlessness of it, to really pummel and torture people
with it as long as possible."

The album as art form took time to develop. The first albums were
cumbersome stacks of three-minute discs, played at 78 r.p.m., in
sleeves bound together like photo albums. They evolved by the 1950's
into the 12-inch, 33 1/3-r.p.m. microgroove LP. But until the 1960's,
singles were the staples of the recording business. Radio stations
played 45's and jukeboxes were stocked with them. Listeners of a
certain age can remember saving up allowance money to buy a 45 single
for less than a dollar.

For many, it was their first purchase of recorded music.

But since the 1960's, the money has been in albums, which have a much
higher profit margin than singles. And while there have always been
albums that surrounded a hit single or two with filler, more ambitious
musicians began trying to make every song on an album worthwhile.

Time is the raw material of music, and as technology provided more of
it, musicians exploited the extra minutes. Fans sat down to
contemplate album covers and scrutinize lyrics for rock operas like
the Kinks' "Arthur" and the Who's "Tommy," and concept albums like the
Beach Boys' "Pet Sounds" and the Beatles' "Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts
Club Band." One concept album, Pink Floyd's "Dark Side of the Moon,"
lingered in the Billboard Top 200 for 591 consecutive weeks.

Yet the success of album sales, for better or worse, has usually
depended on the promotion of one song at a time  through the singles
heard on the radio or later, the tunes turned into video clips for
MTV. Major labels largely phased out the sale of singles, however, in
hopes that fans would buy an entire album  a tactic that caused
short-term gains and long-term resentment. Then along came Napster in
1999.

[...]

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/07/20/weekinreview/20PARE.html



(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is
distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior
interest in receiving the included information for research and
educational purposes.)



-----------------------------------------------------------------
Joseph Lorenzo Hall
Graduate Student                        http://pobox.com/~joehall

-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as interesting-people () lists elistx com
To manage your subscription, go to
 http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/


Current thread: