Interesting People mailing list archives
Re: IP: bad system modularity pays
From: David Farber <dfarber () earthlink net>
Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 16:22:36 -0500
-----Original Message----- From: "Mike O'Dell" <mo () ccr org> Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 16:45:32 To: farber () cis upenn edu Subject: Re: IP: bad system modularity pays this is all very interesting, because in the embedded systems magazines, MS has been running a large, aggressive ad campaign for "Embedded XP" and one thing they tout at great length is the fact the system is broken into over a thousand modular components that let a developer create exactly the footprint and functional capability required for some device. it would seem their court testimony and these adverts paint a rather different story i wonder which one is telling the truth? -mo For archives see: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
Current thread:
- IP: bad system modularity pays David Farber (May 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: IP: bad system modularity pays David Farber (May 02)