Interesting People mailing list archives

IP: Fear of Microsoft strikes the heart of OpenSourcePeople


From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2001 06:14:35 -0400




From: "Janos Gereben" <janos451 () earthlink net>
Subject: Fear of Microsoft strikes the heart of OpenSourcePeople

      Open source projects fear Microsoft patents
      Rachel Chalmers - www.the451.com

      London, Aug. 8 - July's debate between Microsoft executive Craig
Mundie and the open source community was far from interesting. But one
comment that Mundie made at the Open Source Convention certainly got
everyone's attention.

      Asked by CollabNet CTO Brian Behlendorf whether Microsoft will
enforce its patents against open source projects, Mundie replied,
"Yes, absolutely." An audience member pointed out that many open
source projects aren't funded and so can't afford legal representation
to rival Microsoft's. "Oh well," said Mundie. "Get your money, and
let's go to court."

      The attendees, who had been pretty well behaved up until then,
reacted to this comment with boos and hisses. For days after, Mundie's
comment was the talk of the convention. Did Microsoft have a
particular target in mind? If so, who was the unlucky victim?

      Most first guesses - including that of Bruce Perens,
Hewlett-Packard's open source evangelist - identified Ximian, the free
desktop company that had just announced its open source implementation
of certain pieces of Microsoft's .NET. This is because Mono could
allow people to route around the Microsoft-centric nature of .NET, an
anathema to the company, and Microsoft is likely to have patented
everything relating to the applications framework that it possibly
could.

      This week, though, another candidate emerged. Samba is the open
source implementation of Microsoft's Server Message Blocks. The Samba
team has been doing for years what the Mono developers must now learn
to do: reverse-engineering Microsoft protocols. To date, Microsoft has
treated Samba with a certain amount of respect, and developers on
opposing teams often exchange information. It was during one such
discussion that Samba developer Jeremy Allison learned of US Patent
5,719,941 - the "method for changing passwords on a remote computer,"
which applies to a new password-changing feature in SMB.

      Samba now has a dilemma: maintain feature parity and risk
violating the patent, or relinquish the feature and let the
functionality go. On the bright side, Allison has taken care to point
out that the company did not threaten enforcement. "I don't think
Microsoft is planning to wipe out Samba, and it is sheer paranoia to
speculate on that point," he wrote in a Slashdot discussion.

      There's good news for Ximian, too. When Microsoft submitted the
C# language and common language implementation to the European
Computer Manufacturers Association, the company tacitly agreed that
all patented material would be licensed under nondiscriminatory terms.
It's a precondition for acceptance as an ECMA standard.
Nondiscriminatory usually means a small percentage of the per-unit
revenue derived from a software product that depends on the patent. In
the case of free software, of course, a percentage of nothing is still
nothing.

      Microsoft is evidently holding its patents in reserve - as every
responsible public company is expected to do. However, these patents
are not the Doomsday devices they are reputed to be.




For archives see: http://www.interesting-people.org/


Current thread: