Interesting People mailing list archives

IP: Difficulties With Paper Ballot Systems Pointed Out Six Months Ago


From: Dave Farber <farber () cis upenn edu>
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2000 08:33:24 -0500



Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 15:47:38 -0800
From: Ed Gerck <egerck () safevote com>
To: Dave Farber <farber () cis upenn edu>
Subject: Difficulties With Paper Ballot Systems Pointed Out Six Months Ago


[Dave:  This may interest IP'ers -- things did not go wrong
all of a sudden.]

When looking at the current scenario in public elections, it is
useful to consider the lessons gained here.  One of them is IMO
to fight lenient attitudes toward problems.

The overview of an extensive year 2000 market study that Safevote
conducted in the U.S. regarding public elections and the perspective
of Internet voting was made available to the public and published in
the newsletter The Bell [http:/www.thebell.net] in May, June and July
[http://www.thebell.net/archives/]. Florida was one of the five
states researched. Six months ago, The Bell declared:

"The study revealed the tension in having the  power to identify a
problem while lacking the means to solve it.  For example, for vote
recounting the majority of paper punching systems used in the U.S. do
not produce repeatable results when ballots are tallied more than
once, which means that election officials lack the means to
objectively distinguish between fraud and error under these
circumstances.  Thus, the timeliness and usefulness of this study to
the election community, vendors and interest groups cannot be
overstated, as well as its relevance toward future benchmarks to rate
Internet voting systems. The study shows that the performance of
currentsystems is not the "golden benchmark" to which Internet voting
systems should be compared.  There are many faults with the current
systems, as the report will describe, so we should in fact be looking
to Internet voting systems in order to try to reduce those faults and
thus provide for more security than what is available today ­ not
less security."

Cheers,

Ed Gerck


Current thread: