Security Incidents mailing list archives
RE: Standardized Reporting
From: Russell Fulton <r.fulton () auckland ac nz>
Date: 16 Aug 2002 10:37:20 +1200
On Fri, 2002-08-16 at 08:35, Brooke, O'neil (EXP) wrote:
Hello, Since last night's post, I've received several responses both on and off list. Every single one of them was positive and/or supportive of the concept.
Well here's one that isn't ;-) I like the list the way it is. If you try an formalise it I will stop reporting stuff here. I am already quite busy enough looking after an open network with 10,000 hosts in an educational institution. I spend a lot of time monitoring since this is our best defense, given the open nature of our network and so I see a lot of interesting stuff float by. In New Zealand universities have a statutory obligation to serve the community and I see passing observations to this list as one way I can do it. If you want posters to follow particular formats and meet particular standards then you might find the posts dry up. Beware of killing the goose! -- Russell Fulton, Computer and Network Security Officer The University of Auckland, New Zealand "It aint necessarily so" - Gershwin ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service. For more information on this free incident handling, management and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com
Current thread:
- RE: Standardized Reporting Rajiv Dighe (Aug 15)
- RE: Standardized Reporting H C (Aug 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Standardized Reporting Brooke, O'neil (EXP) (Aug 15)
- RE: Standardized Reporting Russell Fulton (Aug 16)
- RE: Standardized Reporting Roman Danyliw (Aug 16)
- RE: Standardized Reporting H C (Aug 16)