Security Incidents mailing list archives

Re: Flash Worms


From: Vern Paxson <vern () ee lbl gov>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 00:31:17 PDT

On large sites, sometimes with several accesses to the Internet, you're
probably right. But (correct me if I'm wrong) such large and complex sites
are not the most common case nowadays, are they ?

I really don't know, and it would be highly interesting to have better
insight into this.  Do the bulk of machines come from (a whole lot of) small,
administratively homogeneous sites, for which it's reasonable to think that
they should be able to get a handle on their site security policies?  Or from
ISPs?  Or from large sites like .edu's?

I suspect the scaling works against security whichever way it goes.  If it's
large sites, it's the problem I've been arguing, that it's fairly intractable
to actually get a handle on *and continue to maintain* some sort of coherent
policy.  If it's small sites, even though in principle the administration is
tractable, there will be enough of them that a significant fraction will
not, for whatever reason, manage to have any sort of solid/coherent policy.

                Vern

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service.
For more information on this free incident handling, management 
and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com


Current thread: