Security Incidents mailing list archives

Re: Port 4

From: lists () FIPS DE (Philipp Buehler)
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2000 20:08:05 +0100


Sean Sosik-Hamor wrote To INCIDENTS () SECURITYFOCUS COM:

# I have noticed a few servers (included mine) lately with port 4
# open.

AppleTalk ECHO Protocol

Hu?
at-echo         204/tcp    AppleTalk Echo
at-echo         204/udp    AppleTalk Echo

Misreading, or ..?

--- End of mail from Sean Sosik-Hamor ---
ciao

--
Philipp Buehler, aka fIpS | BOfH | NUCH | double-p on IRC
When the horse dies, get off.
Artificial Intelligence stands no chance against Natural Stupidity.

Current thread:

Distributed Scanning? Missouri FreeNet Administration (Jan 06)
- Ports 12345, 5742 and 20034 Artur Nowak (Jan 08)
  - Re: Ports 12345, 5742 and 20034 Michal Rok (Jan 10)
    - Re: Ports 12345, 5742 and 20034 Artur Nowak (Jan 11)
- Re: Distributed Scanning? Richard Bejtlich (Jan 08)
- Port 4 Arne Vidar Sjønøs (Jan 09)
  - Re: Port 4 Keith Owens (Jan 10)
  - Re: Port 4 Sean Sosik-Hamor (Jan 11)
    - Re: Port 4 Philipp Buehler (Jan 11)
    - Re: Port 4 Sean Sosik-Hamor (Jan 11)
    - Re: Port 4 Boris Badenov (Jan 11)
    - IRC-bots: what are they for ? Jens Hektor (Jan 12)
    - Re: IRC-bots: what are they for ? Jon Paul, Nollmann (Jan 12)
    - Re: IRC-bots: what are they for ? SecOrg (Jan 12)
    - Re: IRC-bots: what are they for ? Ninja Information Systems. (Jan 12)
    - Re: IRC-bots: what are they for ? Jens Hjalmarsson (Jan 12)
    - Re: IRC-bots: what are they for ? tyler (Jan 12)
    - Re: IRC-bots: what are they for ? David Brumley (Jan 12)
    - Re: IRC-bots: what are they for ? The Undernet Bonk (Jan 12)

(Thread continues...)