Honeypots mailing list archives
Re: Honeyd Censorship
From: Niels Provos <provos () citi umich edu>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 18:17:40 -0400
On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 01:51:10PM -0700, Seth Arnold wrote:
The law outlaws technologies that obscure the source or destination of digital communications from carriers. Honeyd can be configured to fake the presense of entire networks. That sounds like obscuring the source or destination to me. But then, I'm not a lawyer recognized by the bar in any of the states that have passed such laws.
That is my main concern. The law is extremely broad. It seems to apply to almost every networking technology. It does not require intend to defraud or harm. We contacted the university lawyers on the 31st of March but have not heard back from them yet. Niels.
Current thread:
- Honeyd Censorship John Lyons (Apr 10)
- Re: Honeyd Censorship Byrne Ghavalas (Apr 10)
- Re: Honeyd Censorship Jeremy Bennett (Apr 10)
- Re: Honeyd Censorship Seth Arnold (Apr 10)
- Re: Honeyd Censorship Niels Provos (Apr 15)
- Jail Time for Honeypots? Eko Sulistyo (Apr 19)
- Re: Jail Time for Honeypots? George Chamales (Apr 19)
- Re: Jail Time for Honeypots? Bernie, CTA (Apr 20)
- Re: Jail Time for Honeypots? Octavian POPESCU (Apr 21)
- Re: Jail Time for Honeypots? Fernando Martins (Apr 21)
- Re: Jail Time for Honeypots? yannick san (Apr 21)
- Re: Jail Time for Honeypots? Kevin Saenz (Apr 21)
- Re: Jail Time for Honeypots? Jimi Thompson (Apr 21)
- Re: Jail Time for Honeypots? InformationSecurity (Apr 22)
- Re: Jail Time for Honeypots? Fernando Martins (Apr 22)
- Re: Honeyd Censorship Seth Arnold (Apr 10)