funsec mailing list archives
Re: Sandy Hook
From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 17:39:15 -0500
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Blanchard, Michael (InfoSec) <michael.blanchard () emc com> wrote:
Oh, but I do not disagree that police officers and others similiar (doctors too) should undergo pych evals as part of the application process... Not because of the gun they carry, but because of people in general will look up to and look to these people for advise andwell being... They can cause much more harm with words than guns ever will....
Absolutely. I'm not a fan of the Death Penalty, but I could never understand why there are not laws that automatically trigger the sentence for public officials and servants (similar to what we have with criminals). Remember, this is supposed to be a good deterrent. It might of helped with, for example, Antoinette Frank. Jeff
From: Blanchard, Michael (InfoSec) Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2012 05:27 PM To: 'joel.esler () me com' <joel.esler () me com>; 'noloader () gmail com' <noloader () gmail com> Cc: 'funsec () linuxbox org' <funsec () linuxbox org> Subject: Re: [funsec] Sandy Hook I would feel that doctors, lawyers, train/bus drivers, truck drivers, etc would all have to undergo the same psych eval.... As they ALL cause more deaths per year than gun owners........and we can't forget automobile drivers too! Mike B From: Joel Esler [mailto:joel.esler () me com] Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2012 09:41 AM To: noloader () gmail com <noloader () gmail com> Cc: funsec () linuxbox org <funsec () linuxbox org> Subject: Re: [funsec] Sandy Hook They do. At least all the family members I have that are cops have had to/have to. -- Joel Esler Sent from my iPhone On Dec 14, 2012, at 5:25 PM, Jeffrey Walton <noloader () gmail com> wrote: On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Dan White <dwhite () olp net> wrote: On 12/14/2012 14:57, Dan White wrote: .... It may be a bit easier for me in Oklahoma to find the crazy people, since a law allowing citizens to openly carry handguns has recently gone into effect. I can say, without hesitation, that the average private citizen openly carrying a firearm is going to be a great deal crazier than the average citizen. Would that include off-duty police officers? I've always argued folks given a gun for a living should have to go through psychological evaluation and maintain good mental health. New Orleans and Baltimore police departments are a case study.
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re: Sandy Hook, (continued)
- Re: Sandy Hook Blanchard, Michael (InfoSec) (Dec 14)
- Re: Sandy Hook Dan White (Dec 14)
- Re: Sandy Hook Blanchard, Michael (InfoSec) (Dec 14)
- Message not available
- Re: Sandy Hook Dan White (Dec 14)
- Re: Sandy Hook Kenneth Bechtel (Dec 14)
- Re: Sandy Hook Dan White (Dec 14)
- Re: Sandy Hook Jeffrey Walton (Dec 14)
- Re: Sandy Hook Joel Esler (Dec 15)
- Re: Sandy Hook Blanchard, Michael (InfoSec) (Dec 15)
- Re: Sandy Hook Blanchard, Michael (InfoSec) (Dec 15)
- Re: Sandy Hook Jeffrey Walton (Dec 15)
- Re: Sandy Hook Blanchard, Michael (InfoSec) (Dec 15)
- Re: Sandy Hook Kyle Creyts (Dec 15)
- Re: Sandy Hook Dan White (Dec 14)
- Re: Sandy Hook Blanchard, Michael (InfoSec) (Dec 14)
- Re: Sandy Hook Marc (Dec 15)
- Re: Sandy Hook Kyle Creyts (Dec 15)
- Re: Sandy Hook Kyle Creyts (Dec 14)
- Re: Sandy Hook Blanchard, Michael (InfoSec) (Dec 14)