funsec mailing list archives
Re: California opts out of 4th Amendment
From: Chris Boyd <cboyd () gizmopartners com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 16:30:57 -0600
On Jan 6, 2011, at 6:49 PM, Paul Ferguson wrote:
LEAs have some nifty tools to get around that. ;-)
I'd have an issue with that, since they are going beyond a casual examination of the device. Since the purported excuse for the inspection is "officer safety" there's no reason for them to use electronic forensics tools. Courts are going to have fun with this.... --Chris _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- California opts out of 4th Amendment Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah (Jan 05)
- Re: California opts out of 4th Amendment Paul Ferguson (Jan 06)
- Re: California opts out of 4th Amendment David M Chess (Jan 06)
- Re: California opts out of 4th Amendment Larry Seltzer (Jan 06)
- Re: California opts out of 4th Amendment Jeff Kell (Jan 06)
- Re: California opts out of 4th Amendment Paul Ferguson (Jan 06)
- Re: California opts out of 4th Amendment John Bambenek (Jan 06)
- Re: California opts out of 4th Amendment Chris Boyd (Jan 07)
- Re: California opts out of 4th Amendment der Mouse (Jan 08)
- Re: California opts out of 4th Amendment Paul Ferguson (Jan 06)
- Re: California opts out of 4th Amendment Chris Boyd (Jan 07)
- Re: California opts out of 4th Amendment Jeffrey Walton (Jan 07)
- Re: California opts out of 4th Amendment Paul Ferguson (Jan 06)
- Re: California opts out of 4th Amendment Gary Buhrmaster (Jan 07)
- Re: California opts out of 4th Amendment Nick FitzGerald (Jan 08)
- Re: California opts out of 4th Amendment Chris Boyd (Jan 08)