funsec mailing list archives
Re: California opts out of 4th Amendment
From: David M Chess <chess () us ibm com>
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 09:28:10 -0500
When arrested, law enforcement already has the privilege -- under the
law
- -- to inspect all personal belongings on the suspect in the normal
course
of the investigation. Searching a digital device is a natural extension
of
this privilege.
Not necessarily. I believe the reason for the privilege is so that the law enforcement people can ensure that the suspect isn't carrying any weapons that might pose an immediate danger to them (i.e. to search for guns in the waistband, without stopping to get a warrant). It seems unlikely to me that anyone's going to have a gun concealed in their iPhone's address book...
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- California opts out of 4th Amendment Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah (Jan 05)
- Re: California opts out of 4th Amendment Paul Ferguson (Jan 06)
- Re: California opts out of 4th Amendment David M Chess (Jan 06)
- Re: California opts out of 4th Amendment Larry Seltzer (Jan 06)
- Re: California opts out of 4th Amendment Jeff Kell (Jan 06)
- Re: California opts out of 4th Amendment Paul Ferguson (Jan 06)
- Re: California opts out of 4th Amendment John Bambenek (Jan 06)
- Re: California opts out of 4th Amendment Chris Boyd (Jan 07)
- Re: California opts out of 4th Amendment der Mouse (Jan 08)
- Re: California opts out of 4th Amendment Paul Ferguson (Jan 06)
- Re: California opts out of 4th Amendment Chris Boyd (Jan 07)
- Re: California opts out of 4th Amendment Jeffrey Walton (Jan 07)
- Re: California opts out of 4th Amendment Paul Ferguson (Jan 06)
- Re: California opts out of 4th Amendment Gary Buhrmaster (Jan 07)