funsec mailing list archives
Re: Firesheep protection?
From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk () gsp org>
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 17:13:35 -0400
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 12:07:16PM -0800, Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah wrote:
Working towards some protection (not just against Firesheep, but the real problem), anyone have comparative advice on the useability/effectiveness of:
No, but I'll comment that the plug-in zoo is starting to become quite a menagerie. We could argue (we *would* argue) at incredible length about what should and shouldn't be in the baseline browser, but I think, given the plethora of security/privacy threats out there, that it's time to stop leaving these functions to plug-ins and start engineering them into browsers. Some non-overlapping subset of HTTPS Everywhere, NoScript, BetterPrivacy, TACO, etc. is badly needed. ---rsk _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Firesheep protection? Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah (Nov 02)
- Re: Firesheep protection? der Mouse (Nov 02)
- Re: Firesheep protection? Joel Esler (Nov 02)
- Re: Firesheep protection? Robert Graham (Nov 02)
- Re: Firesheep protection? Jeffrey Walton (Nov 02)
- Re: Firesheep protection? Robert Graham (Nov 02)
- Re: Firesheep protection? Jeffrey Walton (Nov 02)
- Re: Firesheep protection? silky (Nov 02)
- Re: Firesheep protection? Rich Kulawiec (Nov 02)
- Re: Firesheep protection? der Mouse (Nov 02)