funsec mailing list archives
Re: Firesheep protection?
From: Joel Esler <joel.esler () me com>
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 17:28:43 -0400
On Nov 2, 2010, at 4:24 PM, der Mouse wrote:
Working towards some protection (not just against Firesheep, but the real problem), anyone have comparative advice on the useability/effectiveness of: [...]I'm no expert on Web risks. But, based what I've managed to find out about Firesheep, it seems to me the real problem underlying it is a human-layer problem and thus is not fixable by technology. Have I missed something, or are you talking about a different "real problem", or what?
The problem, as I see it, is that these Web 2.0 companies didn't really do a good job of authentication in the first place. j _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Firesheep protection? Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah (Nov 02)
- Re: Firesheep protection? der Mouse (Nov 02)
- Re: Firesheep protection? Joel Esler (Nov 02)
- Re: Firesheep protection? Robert Graham (Nov 02)
- Re: Firesheep protection? Jeffrey Walton (Nov 02)
- Re: Firesheep protection? Robert Graham (Nov 02)
- Re: Firesheep protection? Jeffrey Walton (Nov 02)
- Re: Firesheep protection? silky (Nov 02)
- Re: Firesheep protection? Rich Kulawiec (Nov 02)
- Re: Firesheep protection? der Mouse (Nov 02)