funsec mailing list archives
Re: Rethinking FUNSEC
From: "Alex Eckelberry" <AlexE () sunbelt-software com>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:03:27 -0500
I hereby retract all the comments I've made about Gartner. -----Original Message----- From: funsec-bounces () linuxbox org [mailto:funsec-bounces () linuxbox org] On Behalf Of Blue Boar Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 5:13 PM To: Michael Graham Cc: funsec () linuxbox org Subject: Re: [funsec] Rethinking FUNSEC http://seclists.org/funsec/ BB Michael Graham wrote:
Ya if someone were to publicize funsec, what the hell would larry have left for his column? Sorry but this material has already been commercialized please find
other.
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Larry Seltzer
<larry () larryseltzer com
<mailto:larry () larryseltzer com>> wrote: Chill Barry. Everyone back to work. Nothing to see here. Larry Seltzer Contributing Editor, PC Magazine larry_seltzer () ziffdavis com <mailto:larry_seltzer () ziffdavis com> http://blogs.pcmag.com/securitywatch/ -----Original Message----- From: funsec-bounces () linuxbox org <mailto:funsec-bounces () linuxbox org> [mailto:funsec-bounces () linuxbox org <mailto:funsec-bounces () linuxbox org>] On Behalf Of Barry Raveendran Greene Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 2:53 PM To: funsec () linuxbox org <mailto:funsec () linuxbox org> Subject: [funsec] Rethinking FUNSEC Hi Team, IMHO, the garbage in the press are influencing policy makers in governments and corporations to the wrong conclusions. Conclusions which lead
to
actions which is not addressing the reality of the threats. This is now
not
something to be laughed at, but something which is hurting the
industry.
I'm already started to tear into articles which as flawed, not researched, and garbage. I will continue to do that. But we have another option - take the FUNSEC dialog public. This
is not
opening the list, this is taking these conversations - which deal
with
critiquing press articles - public and searchable. Thoughts? Barry _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list. _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list. _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re: Rethinking FUNSEC, (continued)
- Re: Rethinking FUNSEC Larry Seltzer (Nov 19)
- Re: Rethinking FUNSEC Michael Graham (Nov 19)
- Re: Rethinking FUNSEC Larry Seltzer (Nov 19)
- Re: Rethinking FUNSEC Alex Eckelberry (Nov 19)
- Re: Rethinking FUNSEC Larry Seltzer (Nov 19)
- Re: Rethinking FUNSEC Hubbard, Dan (Nov 23)
- Re: Rethinking FUNSEC Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 23)
- Finally someone asks the tough question... robert_mcmillan (Dec 02)
- Re: Rethinking FUNSEC Larry Seltzer (Nov 19)
- Re: Rethinking FUNSEC Nick FitzGerald (Nov 19)
- Re: Rethinking FUNSEC Blue Boar (Nov 19)
- Re: Rethinking FUNSEC Alex Eckelberry (Nov 19)
- Re: Rethinking FUNSEC chris (Nov 20)
- Re: Rethinking FUNSEC Remo Cornali (Nov 20)
- Re: Rethinking FUNSEC chris (Nov 20)
- Re: Rethinking FUNSEC Richard Golodner (Nov 20)
- Re: Rethinking FUNSEC Nick FitzGerald (Nov 20)
- Re: Rethinking FUNSEC chris (Nov 20)
- Re: Rethinking FUNSEC Alex Eckelberry (Nov 20)
- Re: Rethinking FUNSEC Robert Graham (Nov 20)
- Re: Rethinking FUNSEC Dragos Ruiu (Nov 20)
- Re: Rethinking FUNSEC Rich Kulawiec (Nov 21)