funsec mailing list archives
Re: Rethinking FUNSEC
From: "Alex Eckelberry" <AlexE () sunbelt-software com>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:03:08 -0500
You're working for Gartner now? From: funsec-bounces () linuxbox org [mailto:funsec-bounces () linuxbox org] On Behalf Of Larry Seltzer Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 4:54 PM To: Michael Graham; funsec () linuxbox org Subject: Re: [funsec] Rethinking FUNSEC I don't have a column anymore. Nowadays I copy funsec and paste it into Word and sell it as white papers to vendors. Larry Seltzer Contributing Editor, PC Magazine larry_seltzer () ziffdavis com http://blogs.pcmag.com/securitywatch/ From: funsec-bounces () linuxbox org [mailto:funsec-bounces () linuxbox org] On Behalf Of Michael Graham Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 3:54 PM To: funsec () linuxbox org Subject: Re: [funsec] Rethinking FUNSEC Ya if someone were to publicize funsec, what the hell would larry have left for his column? Sorry but this material has already been commercialized please find other. On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Larry Seltzer <larry () larryseltzer com> wrote: Chill Barry. Everyone back to work. Nothing to see here. Larry Seltzer Contributing Editor, PC Magazine larry_seltzer () ziffdavis com http://blogs.pcmag.com/securitywatch/ -----Original Message----- From: funsec-bounces () linuxbox org [mailto:funsec-bounces () linuxbox org] On Behalf Of Barry Raveendran Greene Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 2:53 PM To: funsec () linuxbox org Subject: [funsec] Rethinking FUNSEC Hi Team, IMHO, the garbage in the press are influencing policy makers in governments and corporations to the wrong conclusions. Conclusions which lead to actions which is not addressing the reality of the threats. This is now not something to be laughed at, but something which is hurting the industry. I'm already started to tear into articles which as flawed, not researched, and garbage. I will continue to do that. But we have another option - take the FUNSEC dialog public. This is not opening the list, this is taking these conversations - which deal with critiquing press articles - public and searchable. Thoughts? Barry _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list. _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Put "cyber" and "terrorist" in the story and you get a headline Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah (Nov 19)
- Re: Put "cyber" and "terrorist" in the story and you get a headline Markos Grokus (Nov 19)
- Rethinking FUNSEC Barry Raveendran Greene (Nov 19)
- Re: Rethinking FUNSEC Gadi Evron (Nov 19)
- Re: Rethinking FUNSEC Larry Seltzer (Nov 19)
- Re: Rethinking FUNSEC Michael Graham (Nov 19)
- Re: Rethinking FUNSEC Larry Seltzer (Nov 19)
- Re: Rethinking FUNSEC Alex Eckelberry (Nov 19)
- Re: Rethinking FUNSEC Larry Seltzer (Nov 19)
- Re: Rethinking FUNSEC Hubbard, Dan (Nov 23)
- Re: Rethinking FUNSEC Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 23)
- Finally someone asks the tough question... robert_mcmillan (Dec 02)
- Re: Rethinking FUNSEC Nick FitzGerald (Nov 19)
- Re: Rethinking FUNSEC Blue Boar (Nov 19)
- Re: Rethinking FUNSEC Alex Eckelberry (Nov 19)
- Re: Rethinking FUNSEC chris (Nov 20)
- Re: Rethinking FUNSEC Remo Cornali (Nov 20)
- Re: Rethinking FUNSEC chris (Nov 20)