funsec mailing list archives
Re: truth is for Admins
From: Nick FitzGerald <nick () virus-l demon co uk>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 11:15:03 +1300
chris () blask org wrote: <<..>>
Except, of course, that generally we don't lose any actual lives in the course of dealing with our own compromises so the tenor of our self-pitying whining should be notably less than our automotive peers.
Is that really any kind of an excuse for the perpetrators of what is increasingly, and laughingly, called "software engineering" to continue to execute the extremely crappy "art" that is still their stock-in- trade, despite decades of "whoops, we should have seen that coming" history? "No-one gets killed by our shite software so it's pretty much OK". How fabulous, darling... Regards, Nick FitzGerald _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- truth is for Admins RandallM (Oct 23)
- Re: truth is for Admins Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 25)
- Message not available
- Re: truth is for Admins Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 25)
- Re: truth is for Admins John Bambenek (Oct 25)
- Message not available
- Re: truth is for Admins RandallM (Oct 25)
- Re: truth is for Admins Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 25)
- Re: truth is for Admins Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 25)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: truth is for Admins Les Bell (Oct 25)
- Re: truth is for Admins Rich Kulawiec (Oct 26)
- Re: truth is for Admins chris (Oct 26)
- Re: truth is for Admins Nick FitzGerald (Oct 26)
- Re: truth is for Admins chris (Oct 26)
- Re: truth is for Admins Rich Kulawiec (Oct 26)