funsec mailing list archives
Re: truth is for Admins
From: "Les Bell" <lesbell () lesbell com au>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 00:17:18 +1100
Rich Kulawiec <rsk () gsp org> wrote:
And this in turn is why any security strategy that depends on user education/cooperation has already failed. Completely. It's prudent to presume that one's users are at best utterly incompetent, at worst actively malicious, and design accordingly. << In which case we're stuck between a rock and a hard place, because security strategies that depend upon building a fool-proof system aren't looking too flash, either. Best, --- Les Bell [http://www.lesbell.com.au] Tel: +61 2 9451 1144 _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re: truth is for Admins, (continued)
- Re: truth is for Admins Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 25)
- Message not available
- Re: truth is for Admins Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 25)
- Re: truth is for Admins John Bambenek (Oct 25)
- Message not available
- Re: truth is for Admins RandallM (Oct 25)
- Re: truth is for Admins Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 25)
- Re: truth is for Admins Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 25)
- Re: truth is for Admins Les Bell (Oct 25)
- Re: truth is for Admins Rich Kulawiec (Oct 26)
- Re: truth is for Admins chris (Oct 26)
- Re: truth is for Admins Nick FitzGerald (Oct 26)
- Re: truth is for Admins chris (Oct 26)
- Re: truth is for Admins Rich Kulawiec (Oct 26)