Re: threats abound for 2010 what shall we do, oh my!

[Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster () gmail com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Tomas L. Byrnes <tomb () byrneit net> wrote:

> Congress is debating a law that would require licensing of Infosec
> professionals:
>
> http://datasecurityblog.wordpress.com/2009/08/28/cybersecurity-act-is-fe
> deral-infosec-license-key-to-net-control/
>
> Except in certain jurisdictions (MI FE) where doing forensics or other
> investigations requires a private investigators license:
>
> http://www.myharddrivedied.com/weblog/michigan_to_require_cissp_f.html
>
> There is no current requirement, but that is changing.

But this is only for "InfoSec Professionals" which work on/in/with Federal
Networks, etc., not private industry (unless contracted to the Fed).

Plus, I see this as folly, since "certifications" are a ruse, and are
certainly no evidence of capability, capacity, or expertise.

Also, I see that the Fed is already having problem finding people who want
a salary cut, has a security clearance, and want to be enveloped in a
bureaucratic quagmire:

"U.S. Struggles to Recruit Computer Security Experts"
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/12/22/AR200912220
3789.html

Cheers,

- - ferg

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.5.3 (Build 5003)

wj8DBQFLO/zaq1pz9mNUZTMRAvjAAKC1iUtR0TOtgoTxuosCHmOhu8bm3QCg9XFW
ItMjolJL2+SKu0sk4TmiG48=
=aZTR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



-- 
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 Engineering Architecture for the Internet
 fergdawgster(at)gmail.com
 ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.