funsec mailing list archives
Re: Apparently Milgram is still right
From: "Tomas L. Byrnes" <tomb () byrneit net>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 19:28:53 -0800
Apparently my attempt at wry humor was futile. Precisely because, under whatever your definition of "torture" is, the information extracted due to extremis is unreliable, and the moral hazard of doing so so great, anything that involves "torture" is a violation of ethics, even military ones. Make me listen to Barney for hours, and I'm likely to tell you the sky is purple.
-----Original Message----- From: Alex Eckelberry [mailto:AlexE () sunbelt-software com] Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 6:09 PM To: Tomas L. Byrnes; Gadi Evron; Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah Cc: funsec () linuxbox org; cissp-ethics () yahoogroups com Subject: RE: [funsec] Apparently Milgram is still right Respectfully, that's quite different. -----Original Message----- From: Tomas L. Byrnes [mailto:tomb () byrneit net] Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 9:07 PM To: Alex Eckelberry; Gadi Evron; Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah Cc: funsec () linuxbox org; cissp-ethics () yahoogroups com Subject: RE: [funsec] Apparently Milgram is still right I think it depends on what you classify as torture. Apparently, this
now
includes what the parents of most teenagers endure nightly. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/jun/19/usa.guantanamo-----Original Message----- From: Alex Eckelberry [mailto:AlexE () sunbelt-software com] Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 5:58 PM To: Tomas L. Byrnes; Gadi Evron; Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah Cc: funsec () linuxbox org; cissp-ethics () yahoogroups com Subject: RE: [funsec] Apparently Milgram is still right True, and there is a point of ethics vs. morals. But in the end, there's a line that, IMHO, shouldn't be crossed. Besides, at a purely ethical level, torture is a low-quality interrogation technique. It's overrated in its effectiveness, and creates boomerang effects which don't benefit an overall cause. Nevertheless, even arguing torture at a logical level is difficult for me. It's just reprehensible, not because of some pacificist ideology: Because beating the living shit out of someone for information bringsusto the level of animals, and that's what we've been trying to evolve from for a very long time. Something Matthew Alexander spoke and wrote of recently: http://snipurl.com/8wosv Alex -----Original Message----- From: funsec-bounces () linuxbox org [mailto:funsec-bounces () linuxbox org] On Behalf Of Tomas L. Byrnes Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 8:19 PM To: Gadi Evron; Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah Cc: funsec () linuxbox org; cissp-ethics () yahoogroups com Subject: Re: [funsec] Apparently Milgram is still right I guess it depends on who you think you owe an ethical duty to,
doesn't
it.-----Original Message----- From: funsec-bounces () linuxbox org
[mailto:funsec-bounces () linuxbox org]
On Behalf Of Gadi Evron Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 4:11 PM To: Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah Cc: funsec () linuxbox org; cissp-ethics () yahoogroups com Subject: Re: [funsec] Apparently Milgram is still right On Fri, 19 Dec 2008, Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannahwrote:People are still willing to torture people, when told to do so by
an
authority.http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/em/-/2/hi/health/7791278.stm This may explain some recent happenings, but it is still
disturbing,
nonetheless.We in infosec, and members of society as a whole, have to pushharderon theethics front.What does this have to do with ethics? It's a trick question, think before answering. :)====================== (quote inserted randomly by Pegasus Mailer) rslade () vcn bc ca slade () victoria tc carslade () computercrime orgThis day I call heaven and earth as witnesses against you that Ihaveset before you life and death, blessings and curses. Now choose life.... - Deuteronomy
30:19
victoria.tc.ca/techrev/rms.htmblogs.securiteam.com/index.php/archives/author/p1/_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list._______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list._______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Apparently Milgram is still right Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah (Dec 19)
- Re: Apparently Milgram is still right Gadi Evron (Dec 19)
- Re: Apparently Milgram is still right Tomas L. Byrnes (Dec 19)
- Re: Apparently Milgram is still right Alex Eckelberry (Dec 19)
- Re: Apparently Milgram is still right Tomas L. Byrnes (Dec 19)
- Re: Apparently Milgram is still right Alex Eckelberry (Dec 19)
- Re: Apparently Milgram is still right Tomas L. Byrnes (Dec 19)
- Re: Apparently Milgram is still right Tomas L. Byrnes (Dec 19)
- Re: Apparently Milgram is still right Gadi Evron (Dec 19)
- Re: Apparently Milgram is still right Tomas L. Byrnes (Dec 19)
- Re: Apparently Milgram is still right Gadi Evron (Dec 19)
- Re: Apparently Milgram is still right Tomas L. Byrnes (Dec 19)
- Re: Apparently Milgram is still right Tomas L. Byrnes (Dec 19)
- Re: Apparently Milgram is still right Gadi Evron (Dec 19)
- Re: Apparently Milgram is still right Paul Ferguson (Dec 19)
- Re: Apparently Milgram is still right Gadi Evron (Dec 19)
- Re: Apparently Milgram is still right Blue Boar (Dec 22)
- Re: Apparently Milgram is still right Tomas L. Byrnes (Dec 22)