funsec mailing list archives
Re: House Armed Services Committee discussion on EMP
From: Martin Tomasek <tomasek () ufe cz>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 15:19:56 +0200
Kevin McAleavey wrote:
You guys might find this article, pulished in Popular Mechanics in September of 2001 "interesting" ... http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1281421.html?page=1 Doesn't require a nuke at all ...
Plans for an old model of EM bomb was published few years ago. The only part missing is description of antenna. There are special requirements for antennae, for example no polarisation and wideband range. If you are interested in protection from HEMP, look here: http://cryptome.org/emp.htm -- Martin Tomasek _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- House Armed Services Committee discussion on EMP Gadi Evron (Aug 20)
- Re: House Armed Services Committee discussion on EMP Gadi Evron (Aug 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: House Armed Services Committee discussion on EMP Paul Ferguson (Aug 21)
- Re: House Armed Services Committee discussion on EMP Gadi Evron (Aug 21)
- Re: House Armed Services Committee discussion on EMP Kevin McAleavey (Aug 21)
- Re: House Armed Services Committee discussion on EMP Martin Tomasek (Aug 21)
- Re: House Armed Services Committee discussion on EMP Gadi Evron (Aug 21)