Re: Here's a post to get things going again

[Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu]

On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:45:18 EDT, der Mouse said:
> > OK, I admit it, I don't understand the concept of non-protected
> > low-class speech.  As I read the decision in 'People vs. Larry
> > Flynt', the US Supreme Court doesn't recognize such a beast either,
> > so I'm in good company...
>
> Um, the SCOTUS decision says no such thing exists in the USA (or, let
> us be precise, existed at the time).  This is a very different thing
> from not understanding the concept; if they didn't understand the
> concept they couldn't have said anything coherent about it at all.

Right, and if it doesn't exist, that would explain why I don't understand
the non-existent thing.  Which is what I said. ;)

Attachment: _bin
Description:

_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.