funsec mailing list archives

Re: Juror Speaks: Teacher in Porn Case


From: eliza <ghooti () googlemail com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 23:29:01 -0800

On 2/15/07, Fergie <fergdawg () netzero net> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Let's back up here for a second.


kk, once more for those at the back.

If you could be less cryptic, we'd all be happy to listen, but
raging on issue that's completely ambiguous to Julie Amero's
situation isn't really contributing helping here.


I thought it was funny (this is funsec right?) that someone is
1 - posting their real name and address on the internet
2 - trying to hide behind this alias when the first page (1 of 2) of
google results leads to the said real name and address.
(i dont care about the courtcase - i thought this was funny, well it
made me chuckle - a bit like the court case, this is why all that info
was posted in the first place.. right?)

leading on from this, randys (funny name btw) reaction is also quite
funny.  although i doubt our little conversations will make it to the
list.  This is because (i assume) the moderators thought my original
post was funny, the subsequent bickering was not.

- - ferg

p.s. ...and if you're not part of "the system" here, then STFU.

this is FUNsec.  not injusticesoftheamericanlegalsystemsec so, i was
on topic, otherwise why wasnt the original post moderated?

doesnt anyone else see the humour in this? after all this is a modded
list, not like full-disclosure.



- -- eliza <ghooti () googlemail com> wrote:
idiot.

the point is not that i can 'dig' them up - i dont care what you and
your 'justice' system do. i didnt 'dig' up shit.

http://www.google.com/search?q=ConnYankee1951

[bottom link for the stupid - ie, you]

my point (which you seem you miss entirely) is that how on earth can
you expect anyone that posts their real name and address on the
internet (good move there), then attempt to hide behind an alias -
without even googling their own 'secret' name themselves to make a
judgment on anyone - let alone an informed one - this seems to be show
by thier comments.

check out the spelling mistakes too.

glad i dont live in your country.

p433r t3h g00g13 f00

tit.

(btw petty would be to actually dig up some info and post it to
full-disclosure)  - and for all we know it might have been
connyankee1951 () gmail com....

On 2/15/07, Randy Abrams <abrams () eset com> wrote:
> It not worth anything. It's petty and stupid... Big deal you can find
> the juror. The juror doesn't make the sentence.
>
> The juror can hardly be blamed for an incompetent judge, an even more
> incompetent cop, and a DA who refuses to uphold his oath to pursue
> justice.
>
> Due to an either corrupt or mid-bogglingly ignorant combination of
> Judge, Cop (Lounsbury), DA, and even defense attorney the jury had to
> decide with fabricated information.
>
> It's just petty to dig up and post the guy's details here.
>
> You degrade yourself.
>
> Randy
>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.5.3 (Build 5003)

wj8DBQFF1VlPq1pz9mNUZTMRAk9EAJ9fj/VawJ7vKNNeCi/ShRKRgDHsjACcDD4P
zvvVWtYLQE1QQA4DaoUta8M=
=o8Kg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 Engineering Architecture for the Internet
 fergdawg(at)netzero.net
 ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/


_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.


Current thread: