funsec mailing list archives
Re: Consumer Reports Slammed for Creating 'Test' Viruses
From: Blue Boar <BlueBoar () thievco com>
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 20:01:49 -0700
Toralv_Dirro () mcafee com wrote:
a) it invalidates your test results, as the way you chose to write them may favour some AV products, that simply are lucky their specific generic/heuristic detection is better suited to detect new malwarecreated this way.
And isn't that the situation AV finds itself in with new malware, all the time? So, isn't it "fair" if I do the same to it?
BB _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re: Consumer Reports Slammed for Creating 'Test' Viruses, (continued)
- Re: Consumer Reports Slammed for Creating 'Test' Viruses Dude VanWinkle (Aug 17)
- Re: Consumer Reports Slammed for Creating 'Test' Viruses Drsolly (Aug 17)
- Re: Consumer Reports Slammed for Creating 'Test' Viruses Drsolly (Aug 17)
- Re: Consumer Reports Slammed for Creating 'Test' Viruses Blue Boar (Aug 17)
- Re: Consumer Reports Slammed for Creating 'Test' Viruses Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 17)
- RE: Consumer Reports Slammed for Creating 'Test' Viruses David Harley (Aug 17)
- RE: Consumer Reports Slammed for Creating 'Test' Viruses security curmudgeon (Aug 17)
- Re: Consumer Reports Slammed for Creating 'Test' Viruses Blue Boar (Aug 19)
- Re: Consumer Reports Slammed for Creating 'Test' Viruses Blue Boar (Aug 19)
- RE: Consumer Reports Slammed for Creating 'Test' Viruses Drsolly (Aug 21)
- Re: Consumer Reports Slammed for Creating 'Test' Viruses Dude VanWinkle (Aug 21)