funsec mailing list archives
Re: [privacy] Should Owners Of Web Sites Be Anonymous?
From: "Justin Polazzo" <jpolazzo () thesportsauthority com>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 08:25:17 -0600
-----Original Message----- From: funsec-bounces () linuxbox org [mailto:funsec-bounces () linuxbox org] On Behalf Of warwick ackfin Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 7:33 AM To: funsec () linuxbox org Subject: Re: [funsec] Re: [privacy] Should Owners Of Web Sites Be Anonymous? The goal is to disarm the people? hehehe...that's one certain way to start the uprising they want to avoid. If they can make it to where my weapons are...they have earned the right to get them. On 4/28/06, Peter Evans <peter () ixp jp> wrote:
Kevin McAleavey (kevinmca () nsclean com) wrote:Remember, this is JESUSland you're talking about ... you'd THINK
that by now "the all-seeing eye" would KNOW who's a terrorist and who ain't. Heh. Sorry, couldn't resist ... this episode, like all of the others merely indicates that our politicos have the cluephone qualities of a J-Lo ringtone. :)
Well, I am sure the more straitlaced types would suggest that you lay off the coffee/chocolate/mushrooms. Me, I think I'd like to know where you get yours so I can order some. I have been of the opinion that 9/11 did more for the
freemasons/
circle of rome/illuminati/whatever than all that crap with political correctness ever did. Since the goal is to disarm
the
people so they cant stage an uprising[1], I would expect that next since bush has been doing a truly superlative job. P [1] Of course, the concept of the couchpotato revolution of fatties
storming
Washington D.C with their belliwheels squeaking away is probably
enough to
induce hysteria.
Just set me a-laughin. Well it was more of a wheeze of enjoyment, but you get the idea. -JP<who greases his belliwheel regularly with the leftovers from his KFC breakfast thankyouverymuch>
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
-- Warwick AckFin
Don't tread on me
Don't tread on me ;-) ---------( )--\ \/\/\/\ --- <>< \ Logic&Reason /\/\/\/ ---/ ------------/ _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list. _______________________________________________ privacy mailing list privacy () whitestar linuxbox org http://www.whitestar.linuxbox.org/mailman/listinfo/privacy
Current thread:
- [privacy] Should Owners Of Web Sites Be Anonymous? Richard M. Smith (Apr 27)
- Re: [privacy] Should Owners Of Web Sites Be Anonymous? warwick ackfin (Apr 27)
- Message not available
- Re: [privacy] Should Owners Of Web Sites Be Anonymous? Kevin McAleavey (Apr 27)
- Message not available
- Re: [privacy] Should Owners Of Web Sites Be Anonymous? warwick ackfin (Apr 27)
- Re: [privacy] Should Owners Of Web Sites Be Anonymous? Larry Seltzer (Apr 27)
- Re: [privacy] Should Owners Of Web Sites Be Anonymous? Kevin McAleavey (Apr 27)
- Re: Re: [privacy] Should Owners Of Web Sites Be Anonymous? Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 27)
- Re: [privacy] Should Owners Of Web Sites Be Anonymous? Kevin McAleavey (Apr 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [privacy] Should Owners Of Web Sites Be Anonymous? Justin Polazzo (Apr 27)
- RE: Re: [privacy] Should Owners Of Web Sites Be Anonymous? Justin Polazzo (Apr 28)
- RE: Re: [privacy] Should Owners Of Web Sites Be Anonymous? Justin Polazzo (Apr 28)
- Re: [privacy] Should Owners Of Web Sites Be Anonymous? Justin Polazzo (Apr 28)