funsec mailing list archives
Re: Homegrown terror, or hype?
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 23:29:37 -0400
On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 03:20:09 -0000, Fergie said:
Well, the article _does_ say, in the second paragraph: "The suspects had "aspirations" but "no means" to attack the Sears Tower or other buildings, a senior federal law enforcement source said."
Which means that anybody who has aspirations but no means to effect any meaningful political change in this country are *next* up against the wall....
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re: Homegrown terror, or hype? Fergie (Jun 22)
- Re: Homegrown terror, or hype? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 22)
- RE: Homegrown terror, or hype? StyleWar (Jun 22)
- Re: Homegrown terror, or hype? <...> (Jun 23)
- RE: Homegrown terror, or hype? Blanchard_Michael (Jun 23)
- RE: Homegrown terror, or hype? Drsolly (Jun 23)
- Re: Homegrown terror, or hype? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 23)
- RE: Homegrown terror, or hype? Blanchard_Michael (Jun 23)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Homegrown terror, or hype? Fergie (Jun 22)
- Re: Homegrown terror, or hype? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 22)
- Re: Homegrown terror, or hype? Fergie (Jun 22)