funsec mailing list archives
Re: Homegrown terror, or hype?
From: "Fergie" <fergdawg () netzero net>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 03:20:09 GMT
Well, the article _does_ say, in the second paragraph: "The suspects had "aspirations" but "no means" to attack the Sears Tower or other buildings, a senior federal law enforcement source said." :-) - ferg -- "StyleWar" <stylewar () cox net> wrote: My bet is that these guys weren't a threat proportional to the coverage....course, that's pure speculation, and worth every bit of nothing for an opinion. http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-060622terror,1,469999.story?coll=chi- newsbreaking-hed&ctrack=1&cset=true [snip] -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawg () netzero net or fergdawg () sbcglobal net ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re: Homegrown terror, or hype? Fergie (Jun 22)
- Re: Homegrown terror, or hype? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 22)
- RE: Homegrown terror, or hype? StyleWar (Jun 22)
- Re: Homegrown terror, or hype? <...> (Jun 23)
- RE: Homegrown terror, or hype? Blanchard_Michael (Jun 23)
- RE: Homegrown terror, or hype? Drsolly (Jun 23)
- Re: Homegrown terror, or hype? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 23)
- RE: Homegrown terror, or hype? Blanchard_Michael (Jun 23)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Homegrown terror, or hype? Fergie (Jun 22)
- Re: Homegrown terror, or hype? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 22)
- Re: Homegrown terror, or hype? Fergie (Jun 22)