funsec mailing list archives
Re: RE: [privacy] Frank Rich: Will the Real Traitors Please S tand Up?
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 15:35:51 -0400
On Mon, 15 May 2006 15:12:41 EDT, Jerry Hill said:
I must be missing something. Why in the world would a federal prosecutor in a high profile case use extra-legal means to obtain evidence when there is a perfectly good legal channel to go through?
"We're the executive branch, and above the law. The President says so".
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re: RE: [privacy] Frank Rich: Will the Real Traitors Please Stand Up?, (continued)
- Re: RE: [privacy] Frank Rich: Will the Real Traitors Please Stand Up? Dude VanWinkle (May 15)
- RE: RE: [privacy] Frank Rich: Will the Real Traitors Please Stand Up? StyleWar (May 15)
- Re: RE: [privacy] Frank Rich: Will the Real Traitors Please Stand Up? Brian Loe (May 15)
- Re: RE: [privacy] Frank Rich: Will the Real Traitors Please Stand Up? Dude VanWinkle (May 15)
- Re: RE: [privacy] Frank Rich: Will the Real Traitors Please S tand Up? Fergie (May 15)
- Message not available
- Fwd: RE: [privacy] Frank Rich: Will the Real Traitors Please S tand Up? Jerry Hill (May 15)
- Re: Fwd: RE: [privacy] Frank Rich: Will the Real Traitors Please S tand Up? Valdis . Kletnieks (May 15)
- Re: Fwd: RE: [privacy] Frank Rich: Will the Real Traitors Please S tand Up? Brian Loe (May 15)
- Message not available
- Fwd: Fwd: RE: [privacy] Frank Rich: Will the Real Traitors Please S tand Up? Jerry Hill (May 15)
- Message not available
- Re: RE: [privacy] Frank Rich: Will the Real Traitors Please S tand Up? Jerry Hill (May 15)
- Re: RE: [privacy] Frank Rich: Will the Real Traitors Please S tand Up? Valdis . Kletnieks (May 15)
- RE: RE: [privacy] Frank Rich: Will the Real Traitors PleaseS tand Up? StyleWar (May 15)