funsec mailing list archives
RE: An interesting packet inspection problem
From: Stephen Villano <stephen.villano () us army mil>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 14:56:52 +0300
But it's *SOOO* much more fun to come on shift at beginning of business to find things are going wrong with no warning. Why only a couple of months ago I came in, opened our shop, booted up and logged in (cached logon it turned out) and found I couldn't find the shares from three servers, then couldn't find the mail server. I trotted to the server room in the next building and opened the door to hear: Silence. It turned out that the facility lost power, the building UPS kicked in but the generator had a bad battery. The building UPS eventually failed, the rack UPS's eventually failed... Or when I came on shift and found a rack full of servers in various states of downness (either locked up hopelessly or appearing to be operational, just missing network connectivity due to the protocol layer having a nervous breakdown. It seems that the rack UPS decided to die and glitch the power during the process... Or when the higher command noc-monkeys decided to block SMTP. Not a big deal, save to the mail servers for the command! A few dozen other stories that I am not allowed to relate for security reasons... Calling the Marx brothers help desk... Getting transferred to either Abbot and Costello or more often Curly, Larry and Moe...
-----Original Message----- From: funsec-bounces () linuxbox org [mailto:funsec-bounces () linuxbox org] On Behalf Of Drsolly Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 2:18 PM To: funsec () linuxbox org Subject: Re: [funsec] An interesting packet inspection problem The situation is now resolved. It turned out to be a faulty switch on the Linx network, they rebooted it, and the problem is cleared. Thanks for everyone's help in resolving this. It meant that it was possible to clear the problem before it started to affect businesses when they opened up today. _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re: An interesting packet inspection problem, (continued)
- Re: An interesting packet inspection problem Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 14)
- Re: An interesting packet inspection problem Jeff Kell (Jan 14)
- RE: [AKO Content Warning - Attachments] An interesting packet inspection problem Stephen Villano (Jan 15)
- Re: An interesting packet inspection problem Drsolly (Jan 15)
- Re: An interesting packet inspection problem Gadi Evron (Jan 15)
- Re: An interesting packet inspection problem Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 15)
- Re: An interesting packet inspection problem Drsolly (Jan 15)
- RE: An interesting packet inspection problem Stephen Villano (Jan 16)
- RE: An interesting packet inspection problem Stephen Villano (Jan 16)
- Re: An interesting packet inspection problem Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 14)
- Re: An interesting packet inspection problem Drsolly (Jan 16)
- RE: An interesting packet inspection problem Stephen Villano (Jan 16)
- RE: An interesting packet inspection problem Todd Towles (Jan 16)