funsec mailing list archives
Re: An interesting packet inspection problem
From: Drsolly <drsollyp () drsolly com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 00:32:10 +0000 (GMT)
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 22:22:46 GMT, Drsolly said:Hopefully, the fix will now be simple, and involve either the replacement of faulty hardware, or the cutting-off-of-hands of a faulty engineer.That's the harshest "*BAD* noc-monkey! No Banana!" I've seen in a while...
Huh? No, that's the standard punishment for a first offence of making the entire internet for several countries immpassable to large files. _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- An interesting packet inspection problem Drsolly (Jan 14)
- Re: An interesting packet inspection problem H D Moore (Jan 14)
- Re: An interesting packet inspection problem Gadi Evron (Jan 14)
- Re: An interesting packet inspection problem Drsolly (Jan 14)
- Re: An interesting packet inspection problem Gadi Evron (Jan 14)
- Re: An interesting packet inspection problem Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 14)
- Re: An interesting packet inspection problem Jeff Kell (Jan 14)
- RE: [AKO Content Warning - Attachments] An interesting packet inspection problem Stephen Villano (Jan 15)
- Re: An interesting packet inspection problem Drsolly (Jan 15)
- Re: An interesting packet inspection problem Gadi Evron (Jan 15)
- Re: An interesting packet inspection problem Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 15)
- Re: An interesting packet inspection problem Drsolly (Jan 15)
- RE: An interesting packet inspection problem Stephen Villano (Jan 16)
- RE: An interesting packet inspection problem Stephen Villano (Jan 16)
- Re: An interesting packet inspection problem H D Moore (Jan 14)
- Re: An interesting packet inspection problem Drsolly (Jan 16)
- RE: An interesting packet inspection problem Stephen Villano (Jan 16)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: An interesting packet inspection problem Todd Towles (Jan 16)