funsec mailing list archives

RE: Administrator Accounts


From: "Willy, Andrew" <AWilly () esmil net>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 13:45:19 -0700

Mostly true.  Some organizations use web-based applications that require
installed controls.  If you have several hundred users, and you upgrade the
app, it is nice that your admins don't have to hit every workstation.  

In such a situation a user whose browser trusts the web app server and is a
local admin, client upgrades are transparent.  When they aren't a local
admin, it is the utter opposite. 

Andrew

-----Original Message-----
From: Larry Seltzer [mailto:larry () larryseltzer com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 1:29 PM
To: funsec () linuxbox org
Subject: RE: [funsec] Administrator Accounts


And users can't install software as a standard user, but so what. They
shouldn't
be installing software on company PCs.

NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY-The information in this email, including
attachments, may be confidential and/or privileged and may contain
confidential health information. This email is intended to be reviewed only
by the individual or organization named as addressee. If you have received
this email in error please notify Scottsdale Medical Imaging, an affiliate
of Southwest Diagnostic Imaging, LTD immediately - by return message to the
sender or to support () esmil com - and destroy all copies of this message and
any attachments. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this
email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those
of Scottsdale Medical Imaging. Confidential health information is protected
by state and federal law, including, but not limited to, the Health
Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 and related
regulations.
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.


Current thread: