Re: Court says cops can't yank video: 'Baby cam' catches arrest on tape

[coderman <coderman () gmail com>]

On 2/21/06, Blanchard_Michael () emc com <Blanchard_Michael () emc com> wrote:
>  interesting that they'd be so concerned over that.  It was very civil, and
> the arresting officers were nothing but kind and courteous to the perp
> during the arrest.
>
>   Is this a case of big brother not wanting to be watched?

yes and no.  like the airline security measures which are "sensitive
security information" the photography of police might disclose
"sensitive law enforcement tactics" (whatever they call it in a given
$jurismydicktion).

and like the hassles/confiscation you get for photographing critical
infrastructure this too is now verboten.  the fact that this shields
authority from public oversight is simply a bonus, in their eyes. 
(that would _never_ be the reason to ban such public disclosure, of
course; tis a mere side effect of keeping you safe :)

welcome to the police state.

_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.