funsec mailing list archives
RE: UserFriendly.org: Truth in Acronyms
From: Nick FitzGerald <nick () virus-l demon co uk>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 00:43:03 +1300
Willy, Andrew wrote:
Abbreviations are shortened versions of a word. ...
Wrong. "You're" is an abbreviation of _two_ words. "Ought've" (very bad in the written form, but not unknown in spoken English) is an abbreviation of _three_ words, holding _NO_ indication of the entirely elided "to". By extension (almost to the point of exaggeration), "radar" is thus an abbreviation of five words. BUT, it is a special form of multi-word abbreviation, being one that is not indicated by punctuation _AND_ that is pronouncable as a word in its own right. For this special class of abbreviations, the term "acronym" was coined.
... "Abbr" is an abbreviation of abbrevation.
Or not... 8-)
Acronyms are formed by combining the first letters of several words to form one word. Neither needs to be pronounceable in the real world, ...
That's because of ignorant slippage in the usage. Just as most "simple folk" call anything that goes wrong with their computers a "virus" but you (?) and I would more precisely label as "Trojan Horse", "spyware", "mis-configuration", "user error", etc, many simple folk make no destinction between what language scholars would call an acronym and a (simple) abbreviation (or possibly an "initialism" -- a term I must admit I was unaware of until digging into the topic of this thread; "you've" is an abbreviation, "IEEE" an abbreviation _and_ and initialism, and "radar" both the foregoing and an acronym).
... as far as I know, however when writing HTML it is apparently otherwise.From HTMLhelp.com:"Unlike other kinds of abbreviations, acronyms are pronounceable words, though in some cases the pronunciation is strictly a presentation issue. For example, "SQL" and "URL" are pronounced as words by some people and pronounced letter-by-letter by others. In such cases, authors should use the ABBR element, possibly with a style sheet rule specifying the pronunciation for aural rendering."
Features designed (and documented) by folk with at least a smidgeon of linguistic sensibility I suspect... Regards, Nick FitzGerald _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re: UserFriendly.org: Truth in Acronyms, (continued)
- Re: UserFriendly.org: Truth in Acronyms Dude VanWinkle (Jan 24)
- RE: UserFriendly.org: Truth in Acronyms Gary Funck (Jan 24)
- Re: UserFriendly.org: Truth in Acronyms der Mouse (Jan 24)
- Re: UserFriendly.org: Truth in Acronyms Nick FitzGerald (Jan 24)
- Re: UserFriendly.org: Truth in Acronyms David Lodge (Jan 23)
- Re: UserFriendly.org: Truth in Acronyms Drsolly (Jan 24)
- Re: UserFriendly.org: Truth in Acronyms Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 24)
- Re: UserFriendly.org: Truth in Acronyms David Lodge (Jan 24)
- Re: UserFriendly.org: Truth in Acronyms Richard Cox (Jan 24)
- RE: UserFriendly.org: Truth in Acronyms Nick FitzGerald (Jan 24)
- RE: UserFriendly.org: Truth in Acronyms Paul Schmehl (Jan 24)
- Re: UserFriendly.org: Truth in Acronyms Richard Cox (Jan 24)