funsec mailing list archives
RE: ? - I don't know where to send this one, so I'm sending i t here...
From: "Larry Seltzer" <larry () larryseltzer com>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 20:26:37 -0500
Because many, many years ago, a certain PC-Magazine decided that it was
better for the software vendors to have many, many "signatures" of viruses rather than identifying the "rogue" software. And, at that time, there was one vendor that DID identify the "bad" software (viruses). Unfortunately, that vendor never got good grades in this particular Pc-Magazine's virus "surveys" BECAUSE they didn't have a lot of "signatures". They just had good software that worked BECAUSE it identified the bad software... But, no sigs, no good grades - so no-one bought their antivirus software... I really ought to ignore this because it's so stupid nobody with a brain could actually believe it, but instead I'll point out that my story in the new issue of PCMag that came out yesterday is about non-signature-based malware detection, including Panda TruPrevent, PrevX Pro, Star Force Safe'n'Sec and Pivx preEmpt. Several vendors have been trying to build such products for a long time and if you ask me they're only now becoming worthwhile to run. Larry Seltzer eWEEK.com Security Center Editor http://security.eweek.com/ http://blog.ziffdavis.com/seltzer Contributing Editor, PC Magazine larryseltzer () ziffdavis com _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re: ? - I don't know where to send this one, so I'm sending i t here... Gregory Hicks (Nov 02)
- RE: ? - I don't know where to send this one, so I'm sending i t here... Larry Seltzer (Nov 02)