Re: [OT] the nigger said: "American people understand that not everybody's been following the rules"

["Thor (Hammer of God)" <thor () hammerofgod com>]

I saw this on FB and thought I would pass it along:
http://99percentexif.tumblr.com/

It's the exif data from the photos the 99%'ers are posting - showing the $1000 systems, cameras, and software they are 
using to post.

t

From: full-disclosure-bounces () lists grok org uk [mailto:full-disclosure-bounces () lists grok org uk] On Behalf Of 
Christian Sciberras
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 12:45 AM
To: noloader () gmail com
Cc: full-disclosure () lists grok org uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] [OT] the nigger said: "American people understand that not everybody's been following 
the rules"

Regarding who's doing the most damage to US economy, I'll just say I won't comment.

I take issue with the 1%/99% idea; ie, the excuse that some people deserve more just because they are allowed to lie - 
even if it makes them hypocrites.


On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Jeffrey Walton <noloader () gmail com<mailto:noloader () gmail com>> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 2:51 AM, Christian Sciberras <uuf6429 () gmail com<mailto:uuf6429 () gmail com>> wrote:
> Darren's and indeed many other people's lame excuse is that they're too
> humble to be greedy. As if!
Its not about greed - pursuit of wealth is fine. You just can't harm
others while doing it. (Well, apparently you can in the US).

One of the funniest things I ever read regarding Bin Laden's little
war was a boycott of the US dollar to reduce reliance [on the dollar]
and to harm the US economy [1].

Thought experiment: terrorist wanted to ruin the US economy. US
Financial institutions threw the US (and world) economy into a
recession (again). The US financial institutions responsible must be
terrorist organizations.

Thank {insert higher being here} that Bin Laden did not make a PAC
contribution on 9/10.

Jeff

[1] http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/30/world/middleeast/30binladen.html


> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Jeffrey Walton <noloader () gmail com<mailto:noloader () gmail com>> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Darren Martyn
> > <d.martyn.fulldisclosure () gmail com<mailto:d.martyn.fulldisclosure () gmail com>> wrote:
> > > Chris - Empathy, guilt, and morals. Guilt being a major factor. The
> > > possibility was always there to make millions via evil means, but morals
> > > and
> > > knowing it would be hard to live with.
> > >
> > > The problem is not getting lots of money. That is the easy part. The
> > > issue
> > > is with living with yourself afterward.
> > How about illegal? Check out the Hobbs Act [1]. I'm not making this
> > crap up - the US has laws on the books for negatively affecting
> > commerce (which the crash did), and using fear to peddle their warez
> > (how financial institutions market their instruments). There's
> > probably provisions in the PATRIOT Act, too.
> >
> > The last tine I checked (about a year ago), the SEC had opened fewer
> > than 100 civil investigations. No criminal investigations, despite the
> > fact that some of the financial institutions created spurious ratings
> > companies just to rate their instruments 'good'.
> >
> > Jeff
> >
> > [1]
> > http://www.justice.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/131mcrm.htm
> >
> > [SNIP]

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/