Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Ubuntu 11.10 now unsecure by default
From: GloW - XD <doomxd () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 08:23:02 +1100
Recently some stupid people got into management (as always happens) Oh here your right, but you still can relent, just dont fucking use the os wich sucks, i have learnt that this suually dictates how an os gets put tyogether... or no.... tajke some lessons out of windows even,. but do it smarter... idc, id never put ubuntu on a prod, OR local box, It got me once with the APC mags promo about how cooool ubu is, then i found there is only about 100 bad binarys, your almost there now, only 30 or so togo! almost patched dude! tyhe biggest laugh is, your main binary wich is simplest, is vulnerable to suid attack... i guess some people would know this method, and know what i am talking about.. if not badluck. Now, adding in a known MS flawed user... well, whats stopping it from taking out lamest fucking os of year award... nothing. clean management, and clean your 3rd party addons, then ill maybe consider even using it partially again. It sucks, simple, gimme user ax to your ubuntu, so i can rape it. thx :) On 19 November 2011 18:14, root <root_ () fibertel com ar> wrote:
On 11/18/2011 11:01 AM, Darren Martyn wrote:To be honest, while Ubuntu is hardly secure, it is not DESIGNED to be secure per se. It is designed to wean Windows users away from M$ and toward GNU/Linux OS types. Kind of a "Linux for newbs". My family went from Win XP to Ubuntu years ago and stuck with it. I moved on to Debian, they stuck to Ubuntu and Win7 (eventually) as they are not computer enthusiasts - mere users.Bullshit, Ubuntu is designed (or at least, was designed) to be very secure, check all the stuff it comes by default: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Security/Features Not even the default Debian kernel has all those features activated. If I'm wrong, why you see metasploit modules for Debian but not for Ubuntu? that's the reason. Recently some stupid people got into management (as always happens) and we have things like unity, the fucked up 24-bit ASLR in i386, and this guest account for retards. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: Ubuntu 11.10 now unsecure by default, (continued)
- Re: Ubuntu 11.10 now unsecure by default Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 18)
- Re: Ubuntu 11.10 now unsecure by default Darren Martyn (Nov 18)
- Re: Ubuntu 11.10 now unsecure by default root (Nov 18)
- Re: Ubuntu 11.10 now unsecure by default GloW - XD (Nov 19)
- Re: Ubuntu 11.10 now unsecure by default root (Nov 19)
- Re: Ubuntu 11.10 now unsecure by default charlie (Nov 23)
- Re: Ubuntu 11.10 now unsecure by default dave bl (Nov 23)
- Re: Ubuntu 11.10 now unsecure by default charlie (Nov 23)
- Re: Ubuntu 11.10 now unsecure by default adam (Nov 23)
- Re: Ubuntu 11.10 now unsecure by default deepquest (Nov 23)
- Re: Ubuntu 11.10 now unsecure by default GloW - XD (Nov 19)
- Re: Ubuntu 11.10 now unsecure by default root (Nov 19)
- Re: Ubuntu 11.10 now unsecure by default xD 0x41 (Nov 19)
- Re: Ubuntu 11.10 now unsecure by default Leon Kaiser (Nov 19)
- Message not available
- Re: Ubuntu 11.10 now unsecure by default Leon Kaiser (Nov 21)
- Message not available
- Re: Ubuntu 11.10 now unsecure by default Leon Kaiser (Nov 21)
- Message not available
- Re: Ubuntu 11.10 now unsecure by default Leon Kaiser (Nov 21)
- Re: Ubuntu 11.10 now unsecure by default xD 0x41 (Nov 20)
- Re: Ubuntu 11.10 now unsecure by default Leon Kaiser (Nov 21)
- Re: Ubuntu 11.10 now unsecure by default xD 0x41 (Nov 20)
- Re: Ubuntu 11.10 now unsecure by default Leon Kaiser (Nov 21)