Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Apache 2.0.63 - 2.2.19 Remote Exploit Fake or not?
From: decoder <decoder () own-hero net>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:58:42 +0200
On 06/16/2011 05:23 PM, Andrew Farmer wrote:
On 2011-06-15, at 12:59, kernel wrote:Hi, all, Some days ago I found head -n * of exploit for apache at patebin.com http://pastebin.com/XEFnG9D6 #!/usr/bin/perl # # Apache 2.0.63 - 2.2.19 Remote Exploit # # This 0-day exploit will remotely gain root on any apache server from version 2.0.63 to 2.2.19
Claiming to gain root through a service that most people do not run as root already makes me think that this fake. Best, Chris
# Beta release 2.3.12-beta was also compromised by an affiliate - need verification...The header looks like a crude modification of this 2003 DAV exploit: http://www.exploit-db.com/download/38/ There's also a glaring syntax error on line 22 of the pastebin code. It'd never run as written. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Apache 2.0.63 - 2.2.19 Remote Exploit Fake or not? kernel (Jun 16)
- Re: Apache 2.0.63 - 2.2.19 Remote Exploit Fake or not? Andrew Farmer (Jun 16)
- Re: Apache 2.0.63 - 2.2.19 Remote Exploit Fake or not? mrx (Jun 16)
- Re: Apache 2.0.63 - 2.2.19 Remote Exploit Fake or not? decoder (Jun 16)
- Re: Apache 2.0.63 - 2.2.19 Remote Exploit Fake or not? the nlhcrew (Jun 16)
- Re: Apache 2.0.63 - 2.2.19 Remote Exploit Fake or not? Kai (Jun 17)
- Re: Apache 2.0.63 - 2.2.19 Remote Exploit Fake or not? decoder (Jun 17)
- Re: Apache 2.0.63 - 2.2.19 Remote Exploit Fake or not? Andrew Farmer (Jun 16)