Re: Apache 2.0.63 - 2.2.19 Remote Exploit Fake or not?

[mrx <mrx () propergander org uk>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 16/06/2011 16:23, Andrew Farmer wrote:
> On 2011-06-15, at 12:59, kernel wrote:
> > Hi, all,
> > Some days ago I found head -n * of exploit for apache at patebin.com
> > http://pastebin.com/XEFnG9D6
> >
> >
> > #!/usr/bin/perl
> > #
> > # Apache 2.0.63 - 2.2.19 Remote Exploit
> > #
> > # This 0-day exploit will remotely gain root on any apache server from
> > version 2.0.63 to 2.2.19
> > # Beta release 2.3.12-beta was also compromised by an affiliate - need
> > verification...
>
> The header looks like a crude modification of this 2003 DAV exploit:
>
> http://www.exploit-db.com/download/38/
>
> There's also a glaring syntax error on line 22 of the pastebin code. It'd never run as written.


Prob a typo as the semi-colon key is next to the single quote, at least on my keyboard :)
Makes me wonder if it has been typed into pastebin rather than pasted from working code, which in turn makes me think 
it is probably fake.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEVAwUBTfoqhbIvn8UFHWSmAQJNuAf/fYjbnV4oaoxSJuh2iOjs2oZ4+xi6jDUE
jTlVRtH8NoE3TWaEMgfBZ2QcevUlr74ouIcEvsGwpcwPxZOpk9FipLAvzCosdbEU
GkMfhSDtvQbvSKClC9ZY9ypbCsOjjBISETjQyyIOR6kUqVihTaSCB4Svb8wvFTWR
deQy67lLukzhj75tzzwMM7oVbxjDlv+7evlCs2LuLMss4Sq6zlk66CHrTLfbm+VN
usZ+CdHvBliSwCwbAkNObmRg0GhldHynk9MG58biS6hbqh7Okqwgm5CtB8TJiXR5
ME8dYSgJTxF8ZUh7xkdE9vsuG7/5zZ8AOpL3YA1UysUaY0YvBQySBQ==
=ugps
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/